O
Pasadena
← Community
EnvironmentCommunity discussion

Carbon-free energy funding

Pasadena

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (4)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Apr 13, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedSam BurntApr 13, 2026

Said the CIP funds only a tenth of the needed solar and a third of the storage, and accused PWP of using the carbon-free goal to justify deferred maintenance.

City Council Meeting: - Apr 13, 2026 · 3:04:30 →
ConcernedStanford KrasnerApr 13, 2026

Said many CIP items listed as carbon-free are really deferred maintenance or load-driven upgrades, and urged honest accounting and funding for the OSP projects.

City Council Meeting: - Apr 13, 2026 · 3:04:24 →
OpposedCynthia KennedyApr 13, 2026

Said approving the CIP as drafted would deal a mortal blow to the climate goal and urged a budget-wide review of priorities, criticizing the proposed $33 million PWP headquarters.

City Council Meeting: - Apr 13, 2026 · 3:10:15 →
OpposedTom KingApr 13, 2026

Asked the council to postpone PWP capital items, including the new headquarters, and prioritize solar and storage which he called revenue-generating.

City Council Meeting: - Apr 13, 2026 · 3:12:41 →
OpposedShane SmithApr 13, 2026

Said the CIP ignores the council's carbon-free priorities and urged canceling or deferring other projects to fund revenue-generating solar and storage.

City Council Meeting: - Apr 13, 2026 · 3:14:16 →