O
Pasadena
← Community
EnvironmentCommunity discussion

CIP budget / carbon-free energy

Pasadena

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (3)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 4, 2026.

Public comments (6)

SupportiveClaudia FunkMay 4, 2026

Cited the climate emergency and Eaton fire, urging rapid municipal solar and battery storage as profit-generating, energy-secure assets.

City Council Meeting: - May 4, 2026 · 4:10:15 →
OpposedCynthia KennedyMay 4, 2026

Accused staff of resisting the council's carbon-free directive and urged rejection of any CIP that ignores council priorities.

City Council Meeting: - May 4, 2026 · 4:14:35 →
SupportiveMimi FitzgeraldMay 4, 2026

Reinforced prior speakers, urging the council to fund the projects that get the city farthest toward its 2030 commitment.

City Council Meeting: - May 4, 2026 · 4:27:36 →
OpposedSam BurntApr 13, 2026

Argued the CIP funds only a fraction of the needed municipal solar and storage and mislabels deferred maintenance as carbon-free spending.

City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Apr 13, 2026 · 3:04:30 →
ConcernedSanford KrasnerApr 13, 2026

Complained that routine maintenance items are being counted as carbon-free spending and urged honest accounting.

City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Apr 13, 2026 · 3:04:25 →
OpposedShane SmithApr 13, 2026

Reinforced Pasadena 100's concerns, noting solar and storage are revenue-generating assets that reduce reliance on Glenarm.

City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Apr 13, 2026 · 3:14:17 →