Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Electric rate increases→At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 23, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Questioned the utility's claim of running a deficit, citing $100 million in transfers to the city over five years and inconsistent capital expenditure figures.
City Council Meeting: - Mar 23, 2026 · 4:36:51 →Said the Chamber of Commerce board voted to oppose the increase as too much, too fast, and urged consideration of affordability impacts.
City Council Meeting: - Mar 23, 2026 · 4:35:59 →Said middle-class families, especially immigrants and people of color, will feel the pinch most.
City Council Meeting: - Mar 23, 2026 · 4:42:56 →Caltech urged a three-year phase-in instead of 12 months, citing a $2.6 million annual increase and concerns about demand charges.
City Council Meeting: - Mar 23, 2026 · 4:44:02 →Questioned cost-cutting measures, reverse auctions, and the modest discount for lower-usage customers.
City Council Meeting: - Mar 23, 2026 · 4:46:26 →Congratulated PWP on the rate study but urged empowering ratepayers through time-of-use rates, public solar, and a ratepayer advisory committee.
City Council Meeting: - Mar 23, 2026 · 4:50:05 →Supported the increase, saying deferred maintenance costs more in the end and praising PWP's public-power benefits.
City Council Meeting: - Mar 23, 2026 · 4:52:58 →