Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Tree protection ordinance and PUSD tree removal→At a glance
- Public comments
- 15
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 13, 2026.
Public comments (17)
Said the soil testing justifying tree removal is two seasons outdated and urged the council to examine Measure I and J accountability language.
City Council Meeting: - Jul 13, 2026 · 26:43 →Raised safety concerns about tree removal equipment operating near sit-in protesters despite a stop-work notice; asked the mayor to convene all parties.
City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Jul 13, 2026 · 24:07 →Thanked the council for enforcing the tree protection ordinance against the school district and asked for more dialogue and transparency with the school board.
City Council Meeting: - Jul 13, 2026 · 15:05 →Described century-old trees tagged for removal near the district administration building and thanked the city for intervening.
City Council Meeting: - Jul 13, 2026 · 16:01 →Applauded the city for upholding the tree protection ordinance and urged maximum penalties and protection plans for work near protected trees.
City Council Meeting: - Jul 13, 2026 · 20:01 →Raised safety concerns about cherry-picker work near student protesters despite a city stop-work notice and asked the mayor to convene all parties.
City Council Meeting: - Jul 13, 2026 · 24:05 →A speech and language therapist thanked the council for supporting the tree protection ordinance, saying children need more trees, not fewer.
City Council Meeting: - Jul 13, 2026 · 26:04 →Said DTSC isn't requiring tree removal, cited successful tree-preserving remediation in Altadena, and asked the council to scrutinize the emergency exemption and require normal permitting.
City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Jun 15, 2026 · 34:55 →A 17-year-old who spent eight hours sitting in an oak tree marked for removal asked the council to spare the trees.
City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Jun 15, 2026 · 36:26 →Urban Forestry Advisory Committee member said PUSD is improperly bypassing the tree ordinance to remove 193 healthy trees, since the emergency exemption only applies to hazardous trees.
City Council Meeting: - Jun 15, 2026 · 31:12 →Paloma's mother, a homeowner and physician, described being bounced between the state and PUSD and begged the council to have planning and the city attorney review the district's submissions.
City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Jun 15, 2026 · 37:29 →District 2 resident and EAC member urged the council to halt the tree removals until there is transparent information, noting better soil remediation methods exist.
City Council Meeting: - Jun 15, 2026 · 33:02 →Former PUSD student and UFAC member said DTSC doesn't require tree removal, cited successful Altadena remediation preserving trees, and asked the council to scrutinize the emergency exemption.
City Council Meeting: - Jun 15, 2026 · 34:55 →A 17-year-old who spent eight hours sitting in an oak tree marked for removal asked the council to save the trees.
City Council Meeting: - Jun 15, 2026 · 36:26 →Paloma's mother, a homeowner and physician, described being referred between the state and PUSD and begged the council to have the planning department and city attorney review the exemption.
City Council Meeting: - Jun 15, 2026 · 37:28 →An Urban Forestry Advisory Committee member said PUSD is removing 193 healthy trees without required permits, misusing the hazardous-tree emergency exemption, and asked the council to enforce the tree ordinance.
City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Jun 15, 2026 · 31:12 →A District 2 resident urged the council to halt the tree removals until there's transparent information, noting some trees are over a century old and better soil remediation methods exist.
City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Jun 15, 2026 · 33:02 →